Paraphilias are not primarilly personality alterations. Oedipus or other complexes themselves are the superstructure of the underlying sexual anomaly (Kolářský, 1996 a), as Sigmund Freud himself anticipated (1926). The application of personality constructs to paraphilics is highly risky from the epistemological point of view, because the tacit assumption of the validity of some personality constructs is sexual normality, and it is undesirable from the ethical and therapeutical point of view, because almost all the names of these constructs have some derogatory meaning (Kolářský, 1996 a). See for example the above-mentioned „inability to postpone gratification", or „emotional immaturity" „lack of social skills" etc. In the area of specific deviant interest, the paraphilic subject shows no deficits of maturity or skills. Psychology of personality is in danger of becoming an instrument of the authoritarian part of the erotic majority. This discipline should acknowledge plurality of social standards. A deficiency in normal courtship skills must not be generalized as a deficiency in all social skills. The erotic majority tends to hide its courtship preferences under the terms of social maturity and social skills