Ksenia
Фея
Цитата:
Отвечаю: "Violence and Sexuality in the Modern Era answers this question by considering the larger cultural context of the science of sexuality. My book shows that this science participates in the broad political movement of liberalism that began in the early nineteenth century and that has become dominant in Western societies. A fundamental assumption of liberalism is that freedom does not lead to anarchy, for human nature is good, or at least good enough. As John Stuart Mill explained, while despotism was a legitimate mode of government for barbarians, liberal governing is possible in our modern society because mankind has “become capable of being improved by free and equal discussion.” Instances of extreme and unmotivated violence raise then a challenge to liberalism and need to be explained away. This is where the science of sexuality has played a crucial role: since the nineteenth century it has detached sexual violence from its purely moral implications and has transformed it into the symptom of a type of sexuality, i.e., into the expression of a diseased sexual instinct, which cannot be controlled and which defines one’s identity. “The sadist” and “the pedophile” have become possible kinds of people who are categorically different from “normal” people. Having been defined out of humanity, <u>these “perverts” no longer threaten the necessary optimism of liberalism, and instead become its requisite personages</u>."
Патрик Синджи ответил на этот вопрос. В либерализме считается, что суть человека хорошая. Но есть какие-то случайные акциденции бесконечной субстацнии, которые плохие. Эти акциденции нечеловеческие, чужды человеческой природе, и соответственно с ними надо обращаться не как с людьми с светлым, добрым началом. Ты как человек своей эпохи их обесчеловечиваешь. Я - нет.
Отвечаю: "Violence and Sexuality in the Modern Era answers this question by considering the larger cultural context of the science of sexuality. My book shows that this science participates in the broad political movement of liberalism that began in the early nineteenth century and that has become dominant in Western societies. A fundamental assumption of liberalism is that freedom does not lead to anarchy, for human nature is good, or at least good enough. As John Stuart Mill explained, while despotism was a legitimate mode of government for barbarians, liberal governing is possible in our modern society because mankind has “become capable of being improved by free and equal discussion.” Instances of extreme and unmotivated violence raise then a challenge to liberalism and need to be explained away. This is where the science of sexuality has played a crucial role: since the nineteenth century it has detached sexual violence from its purely moral implications and has transformed it into the symptom of a type of sexuality, i.e., into the expression of a diseased sexual instinct, which cannot be controlled and which defines one’s identity. “The sadist” and “the pedophile” have become possible kinds of people who are categorically different from “normal” people. Having been defined out of humanity, <u>these “perverts” no longer threaten the necessary optimism of liberalism, and instead become its requisite personages</u>."
Последнее редактирование:
